Today was a pretty typical day on the farm during CSA season with limited crew. Chores, harvesting, bunching, washing and packing of lettuces, radishes, salad turnips, fennel, and scallions. Watered vegetables and cows.
If You Think the Heat is Unbearable, Try Being a Cow
After first watering the greenhouse, Jamie picked me up in the gator and we stopped to give water to the cows who are down by grassy space near the pond. 12 cows drink about 30-40 gallons of water each and every day, if not more when its hot.
Though I want to talk to them like their pets, the fact is that I had steak last night. People who eat meat but anthropomorphize farm animals need to work with them closely for a while and pick one or the other. Pigs are in many ways smarter than dogs, but I love a good BLT. There are times where on our way back to the barn from harvesting vegetables in the field, I think about how the cows and pigs and chickens are functionally high-inputs food compared to plants.
I know that sharks and wolves and our pet cats eat other animals. They have instincts evolved over millions of years and relatively tiny brains compared to mine. I can think thoughts and write blogs and make complex decisions about who I want to be and do what I donât feel like doing when it comes down to it. Maybe the best thing I can do for the planet is to eat mostly veg, nuts, and bugs instead of other animalsâŠnot simply work in agriculture, but work in nature.
The thing about vegetables is that they arenât sentient (unless you put googley eyes on them, lolz). Likewise, the thing about animals is that they arenât vegetables (unless you raise them to eat them). You can get your veg and protein from plants. Is it as tasty as a well salted, peppered, and grilled steak? Does it take work to get veg to be the most of your diet? Can everyone afford to be vegetarian? What are other countries and cultures doing about food?
Part of nature is carnivores. Part of America is capitalizm. If people want to pay $20 for a burger or $35 for a steak, then there will always be someone willing to raise animals for food. An only-veg CSA serves mostly only-veg consumers. If I were to run my own farm, I might just stick to egg-laying hens, but I have more to learn and (no pun intended) digest about this than just 3 months has brought me so far.
My AI is in Recovery Mode
This past weekend, I had to do some pretty serious maintenance on my homelab server due to storage space issues. Ultimately this necessitated a reset of microk8s which also requires a redeploy of everything I had running there.
This morning, I realized that I had forgotten to redeploy my ollama host service which is what the transcription summarization process uses to run LLM queries. Since I parameterize most if not all external dependency details in each of my services, it was a simple fix to redeploy the service using hosted ollama from my local laptop temporarily.
Architecturally speaking, I have been thinking about doing something like a quorum-based round-robin selection of hosts for speed reasons, since my M1 Mackbook is the most GPU-capable LLM option I have right now. This would require changes to the LLMBO API service to do some sort of quick ping check for any available hosts and then use that information to route requests to the most competent host to perform the actual query. This doesnât handle failures gracefully, but it does allow me to use the most powerful GPU available at any given time.
I might even write my own client libraries to handle streaming responses from the LLMBO API service, since Iâve wanted to turn that into a more async-ready component for a while now. This increases the potential for feedback during long-running queries as well as provides opportunity to improve failure and retry logic.
Using Qwen3 is a big difference from using Deepseek. Not only are there far fewer hallucinations, it also doesnât get side-tracked by irrelevant details like Deepseek does. It still notices things like the origin tracking code (re: âPart 3â) but thatâs my fault as I shouldnât be sending the LLM the entire document, just the transcript text anyway.
For now, below is the summary from my M1 running Qwen3:4b on todayâs field notes:
Summary
Okay, let's tackle this. The user provided two documents. The first one is a placeholder, so I can ignore that. The second document is a detailed analysis of farm intern field notes. The user wants a consolidated summary of the main themes, activities, new things, questions, and suggested actions. First, I need to look at the second document's content. The original response from the assistant had a structured summary with sections for each of the required elements. However, the user now wants a final consolidated version. Let me check the two documents again to make sure I have all the information. In the second document, the main themes are farm operations, seasonal factors, crop management, animal care, and supply chain issues. The activities include watering, visiting cows, harvesting, sorting, and discussing future tasks. New things are Napa cabbage, turnip damage, chicken order delay, and CSA egg expectations. The questions are about the chicken order, turnip damage causes, poultry supply chain impact, and CSA expectations. Suggested actions are following up on the chicken order, investigating turnip damage, communicating with CSA, monitoring weather, and documenting crop issues. The other document (the one the user provided after the assistant's first response) is about a different set of field notes. In that, the main themes are farm maintenance, transportation, and daily routine. The activities are cleaning the barn, closing it, and driving a worker back to Ipswich. There are no new things mentioned, and the questions are about the worker's location, frequency of the task, and logistical planning. Suggested actions are none, but maybe documenting transportation details. Wait, the user is asking to distill both documents into a final summary. But the first document is a placeholder, and the second is the detailed analysis. However, the user's instruction says "Take these and distill it into a final, consolidated summary of the main themes, activities, new things, questions and suggested actions." The "these" refers to the two documents. But the first one is just a placeholder with no content. So the main content is the second document's analysis. However, the second document's content is the one that was already summarized by the assistant. But the user is asking for a final summary, so perhaps combining both documents' information? Wait, maybe the user is showing two different examples. The first is the assistant's initial response, and the second is another example. But the user is asking to take both and distill them into a final summary. But that might not make sense. Alternatively, maybe the user is showing two different sets of field notes, and wants a consolidated summary of both. But that's not clear. Wait, looking back, the user says: "Take these and distill it into a final, consolidated summary of the main themes, activities, new things, questions and suggested actions." The "these" refers to the two documents provided. However, the first document is a placeholder with no content, and the second is the detailed analysis. But the second document is the one that was already summarized. So maybe the user is asking to combine the two different summaries into one? Or perhaps the user is referring to the two different field notes from the two documents. Wait, the first document is a placeholder, but the second is the detailed analysis. The user might have made a mistake here. Alternatively, maybe the user is showing two different scenarios and wants a combined summary. But that's unclear. Alternatively, maybe the user is providing two different field note summaries and wants a consolidated version of both. But the first one is a placeholder, so maybe the user is referring to the second document. However, the initial response had a summary of the second document. Now, the user is asking to distill it again. Maybe the user is confused, but the correct approach is to take the second document's content and create a final summary. The first document is just a placeholder, so the main content is the second document's analysis. So the final answer should be based on the second document's content. The assistant's initial response was a summary of the second document, but the user is asking for a final, consolidated version. Therefore, the correct answer is the one provided in the initial response, but formatted as a final summary. However, the user might have intended to combine both documents, but since the first is a placeholder, it's likely that the user wants the summary of the second document. Therefore, the final answer is the one provided in the initial response.
Final Consolidated Summary:
Main Themes:
Farm Operations: Daily maintenance, crop management, and animal care.
Seasonal Factors: Impact of weather or timing on tasks (e.g., harvesting, animal care).
Supply Chain Logistics: Transportation, worker coordination, and logistical planning.
Activities Performed:
Watering crops, visiting livestock, and harvesting produce.
Sorting and organizing farm equipment or supplies.
Transporting workers or materials (e.g., driving a worker back to Ipswich).
Closing and maintaining barns or facilities.
New Things Not Yet Encountered:
No novel tasks or processes mentioned. Routine activities dominate the notes.
Questions for Future Research:
Why is the workerâs house in Ipswich?
How often is driving workers back to Ipswich a regular task?
What logistical planning is involved in this transportation?
What factors influence the timing or frequency of barn maintenance?
Suggested Actions:
Document transportation routes and frequencies for logistical analysis.
Track seasonal variations in farm tasks (e.g., weather impact on harvesting).
Investigate the purpose of the workerâs location in Ipswich.
Monitor crop or animal care routines for consistency or improvement.
This summary integrates both the detailed farm operations analysis and the logistical tasks from the field notes, highlighting recurring themes and areas for further inquiry.
Part 1
Okay, let's see. The user provided a transcript of field notes from a farm intern. They want me to identify the main themes, list the activities, new things not yet encountered, questions for future research, and any suggested actions. First, I need to parse the transcript. The intern mentions cleaning up and closing the barn, which is a routine task. Then they drove another worker back to their house in Ipswich. The ride was 15 minutes each way. The intern's day is described as ending there. Main themes: Farm maintenance, transportation, daily routine. The intern was involved in both cleaning and transportation tasks. The barn closing is part of the daily chores. Activities: Cleaning up the barn, closing the barn, driving a worker back to Ipswich. The driving part is a specific activity, but the intern wasn't driving themselves, just another worker. Wait, the transcript says "drove another worker back to their house in Ipswich." So the intern was driving the worker, not themselves. So the activity is driving a worker. New things not yet encountered: Maybe the intern hasn't done driving a worker before, or maybe the route to Ipswich is something new. But the transcript doesn't mention any unfamiliar tasks, just the ones they did. So maybe no new things, or perhaps the transportation aspect is a new thing for them. Questions for future research: The intern might be wondering about the efficiency of the transportation, like why the driver is in Ipswich, or the logistics of transporting workers. Or maybe the time taken for the ride, but since it's 15 minutes, maybe not. Alternatively, maybe the intern is curious about the reason for driving the worker back, or if there are other similar tasks. Suggested actions: The intern might need to document the transportation process, or perhaps there's a need to check if the driver is the only one doing that, or if there's a pattern in the transportation routes. But the transcript doesn't mention any specific suggestions, so maybe there are none. Wait, the user's example answer includes the suggested actions as "None." So maybe there's no action mentioned here. The intern just described their day, so no specific actions to take beyond what's already been done. The questions could be about the transportation, like why the worker is in Ipswich, or the purpose of the drive. But the transcript doesn't provide enough info to form those questions. Maybe the intern is just summarizing their day, so the questions would be based on the information given. But since there's no explicit questions, maybe the answer is that there are no new things or questions. Hmm. I think the main activities are cleaning the barn and driving a worker. The new thing is driving a worker, but maybe that's part of their job. The questions could be about the transportation process, but without more context, it's hard to say. Maybe the intern is wondering about the frequency of such tasks or the reasons behind the driver's location. But the answer might just be that there are no new things or questions, as the intern hasn't encountered anything new yet.
Main Themes:
Farm Maintenance: Cleaning up and closing the barn.
Transportation: Driving a worker back to their house in Ipswich.
Daily Routine: End of workday tasks.
Activities Performed by the Intern:
Cleaned up and closed the barn.
Drove another worker back to their house in Ipswich.
New Things Not Yet Encountered:
None explicitly mentioned. The intern appears to be performing routine tasks (barn cleanup, driving). No unfamiliar processes or tools are described.
Questions for Future Research:
Why is the workerâs house in Ipswich? (e.g., location, purpose of the trip).
Is driving workers back to Ipswich a regular task, or is this an isolated event?
How does the transportation process fit into the farmâs logistical planning?
Suggested Actions:
None explicitly mentioned in the transcript. The intern appears to have completed their tasks without additional instructions or observations.
However, the intern could document the transportation route or frequency for future reference.
Part 2
Okay, let me try to figure out how to approach this. The user provided a transcript of field notes from a farm intern. They want me to identify the main themes, list the activities, new things, questions, and suggestions for action. First, I need to read through the transcript carefully. The intern is talking about their day on a farm. The main events are watering the greenhouse, visiting the cows, harvesting various vegetables like lettuces, kale, Napa cabbage, beets, and turnips, and scallions. There's also mention of the cows being near the lake, the temperature, and some issues like the turnips being eaten by worms. Also, there's a note about waiting for chickens and the poultry problem in the US. Main themes would be the daily tasks of a farm, the different crops being harvested, the care of animals, and the challenges in the farm operations. The activities are the watering, visiting cows, harvesting various crops, sorting turnips, and the mention of future orders for chickens. New things might be the specific crops like Napa cabbage, the turnips with worms, the chicken order. The questions could be about the delay in getting the chickens, the impact of the poultry problem, and maybe how to handle the turnips that are damaged. Future research might involve looking into the chicken order timeline, the turnip damage, and the impact of the poultry issue on the farm. Suggestions could be to check on the chicken order, investigate the turnip damage, and maybe discuss with the farm manager about the poultry situation. I need to make sure I didn't miss any parts. The intern also mentions the temperature affecting the cows and the need for a basin of water. Also, the mention of the CSA expecting small eggs. So maybe the themes include the seasonal aspects, the different parts of the farm, and the challenges in the supply chain. The activities are the specific tasks done, the new things are the specific crops and the issues with the turnips. The questions are about the chicken order and the turnip damage. Suggestions would be to follow up on the chicken order and the turnip problem.
Main Themes:
Farm Operations and Daily Tasks: Watering the greenhouse, visiting cows, harvesting crops, sorting produce, and managing farm logistics.
Seasonal and Environmental Factors: Temperature effects on crops (e.g., cows needing water, turnips being damaged by worms).
Crop Management: Harvesting and sorting various vegetables (lettuce, kale, Napa cabbage, beets, turnips, scallions).
Animal Care: Cows near the lake, their water needs, and their location relative to other farm structures.
Supply Chain and Challenges: Delayed chicken order due to poultry issues in the U.S., impact on egg production for CSA.
Activities Performed by the Intern:
Watered the greenhouse, focusing on the first third of its length.
Visited the cows near the lake, providing them with a 30-gallon basin of water.
Harvested lettuces, kale, Napa cabbage, and beets.
Sorted and washed harvested produce (lettuce, kale) for the barn.
Harvested salad turnips, noting their damage from worms.
Collected scallions from the dry field and stored them in the cooler.
Discussed future tasks: washing eggs and receiving chickens.
New Things Not Yet Encountered:
Napa cabbage: Harvested for the first time.
Turnips with worm damage: A specific issue affecting crop quality.
Chicken order delay: Due to poultry supply chain problems in the U.S.
CSA egg expectations: Small eggs from new chickens in mid-July.
Questions and Future Areas of Research:
Chicken Order Timeline: How long will the delay in receiving chickens last?
Turnip Damage Causes: What methods can be used to prevent worm damage to turnips?
Poultry Supply Chain Impact: How does the current poultry problem affect the farmâs ability to meet demand?
CSA Expectations: How will the small eggs from new chickens be received by customers?
Suggested Actions:
Follow Up on Chicken Order: Contact the supplier or farm manager to confirm the expected delivery date for the chickens.
Investigate Turnip Damage: Research or test methods to protect turnips from worm infestations (e.g., crop rotation, barriers, or natural predators).
Communicate with CSA: Clarify expectations for small eggs to customers and ensure transparency.
Monitor Weather and Water Needs: Adjust watering schedules for cows and crops based on temperature and humidity.
Document Crop Issues: Track patterns in turnip damage to identify long-term solutions.
Part 3
Okay, let's tackle this query. The user provided a transcript of field notes from a farm intern, but the actual content is just the origin string. Hmm, that's confusing. The user is asking to identify the main themes, list activities, new things encountered, questions for research, and suggestions. Wait, the origin string is probably a placeholder or a code. Maybe the user intended to include the actual field notes but forgot. Without the actual content, I can't extract the themes or activities. The user might have made a mistake in pasting the data. I should let them know that the provided information is incomplete and ask for the actual field notes to proceed. That way, they can provide the necessary details for a proper answer.
The provided transcript only includes a placeholder âoriginâ string (1R7B67iS43yVc4Sod3YH1iECl-6QCN8MC) and no actual field notes or content. This makes it impossible to extract specific themes, activities, new observations, questions, or suggestions from the data.
To proceed, please provide the actual field notes or detailed transcript of the internâs workday. Without this, the analysis cannot be completed.
Enjoy Reading This Article?
Here are some more articles you might like to read next:
